Recently Paul Krugman touted drug costs under Medicaid as a big win as compared to the hobbled Medicare Part D which is run by private insurors.
"Last year a government study compared the prices that Medicaid paid for
brand-name drugs with those paid by Medicare Part D — also a government
program, but one run through private insurance companies, and explicitly
forbidden from using its power in the market to bargain for lower
prices. The conclusion: Medicaid pays almost a third less on average."
One thing missing in the medical market is the price tag. We see direct pricing on everything we need: housing, food, automobiles. Everyone manages to select from cable TV, satellite service and phone company options by listed prices on their entertainment channels and options. Yet few people are engaged in comparing prices when it comes to something as important as medical care. Why is this?
Reason TV brings us a view on what can happen to costs when the consumer gets pricing ahead of time, even if insurance is not involved.
Free market supporters obviously point to the Surgery Center of Oklahoma and Medibid as a direction to investigate. Paul Krugman favors more control from above and less personal involvement. It is for your own good after all...
Annie Wilkes administers Dr. Krugman's prescription for fair prices
We last brought up the economic aspect of natural disasters back in May, this week Reason.TV brings us word on why there is a gas shortage after Hurricane Sandy wrecked havoc in New Jersey and New York states.
Politicians with good intentions trying to make price controls work
proves too tempting for some. It is pretty safe to say that stores
would indeed charge more for gas since delivery trucks and fuel storage
were also affected by Sandy's destruction. Trucks coming from farther
away simply add more to the cost. But would customers be paying twice
as much? If stores could charge more would they have more incentive to refill their tanks?
Learn Liberty has this quick study on the ways price bumps can be beneficial during tough times.
Two years ago he stated "We lost that election, because almost every political contest yesterday was won by a politician. In a couple of cases angry nuts won, which is an improvement over politicians. But it's just no good enough."
Here's a clip of him speaking on the topic and his vision for what would make a better political situation: Kill, Screw, Marry. Economic freedom via the Free Market. "Wrong rights" which kill freedom and what political power is verses freedom. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296475-1
Now I hope our followers are rational and vote wisely if they do vote... just remember that you're encouraging those bastards. ;) I'm sure you have connected the power of voting to how it relates to economics so share this with your friends who may not have made that connection yet and start the conversation next time you see them!